HAL: Heuristic Algorithmic Library
American Chapbooks: Reconfiguring Literary and Artistic Prestige

Where the Crow Breathes Black Stars:

Larry D. Thomas and his expansion of the crow archetype as established by Ted Hughes

Click HERE to explore or download more examples of the work of Larry D. Thomas.

Click on HERE to download this pamphlet.

ABSTRACT

This article examines how Larry D. Thomas’s crow poems—particularly A Murder of Crows (2011) and “Crow‑Speak” from Mississippi River Delta: A Bestiary (2025)—extend and transform the mythopoetic legacy of Ted Hughes’s Crow (1970). While Hughes’s Crow functions as a trickster‑survivor navigating a broken cosmos, Thomas’s crow evolves into a cosmological force capable of generating and wounding the universe itself. Drawing on Benjamin Myers’s influential reading of A Murder of Crows as a work of the “dark sublime,” the essay argues that Thomas’s structural crescendo, regional naturalism, and imagistic precision culminate in a crow that not only confronts terror but transfigures it into art. Through close reading and comparative analysis, the article demonstrates that Thomas redefines the crow archetype by shifting from mythic endurance to ontological authorship, thereby expanding the symbolic and metaphysical possibilities of avian representation in contemporary poetry.

Keywords: Larry D. Thomas; Ted Hughes; Crow; dark sublime; mythopoesis; American bestiary; cosmological poetics; Benjamin Myers; Jeffrey C. Alfier; Leonard Baskin; avian violence; contemporary poetry

INTRODUCTION

Ted Hughes’s Crow (1970) remains one of the most audacious mythopoetic undertakings of the twentieth century. Its titular figure—Crow—emerges as a trickster, a witness to divine failure, and a survivor of cosmic catastrophe. Hughes’s Crow is thrust into a universe already in motion, a universe marked by violence, absurdity, and grotesque humor. As Jonathan Bate observes, Crow “inhabits a mythic landscape in which the gods are incompetent and creation is a botched experiment” (214). Crow’s role is not to create but to endure, navigating the wreckage of a world whose metaphysical architecture is fundamentally broken.

Larry D. Thomas’s crow poems, written more than four decades later, enter into direct and deliberate dialogue with Hughes’s achievement. Thomas’s A Murder of Crows (2011) is dedicated to Hughes, and the poem “Sunbird” in Section IV of A Murder of Crows (2011) is dedicated to Leonard Baskin, whose stark, angular crow illustrations helped define the visual identity of Hughes’s Crow.  Thomas also dedicated his collection The Skin of Light (2010) to Baskin. Yet Thomas does not merely inherit the Hughesian crow; he transforms it. Through structural crescendo, regional naturalism, expressionist compression, and cosmological ambition, Thomas elevates the crow from mythic protagonist to cosmic author, a being whose breath generates black holes and whose voice wounds the fabric of space‑time. This essay argues that Thomas’s crow poems—especially “Crow‑Speak” from Mississippi River Delta: A Bestiary (Buttonhook Press, 2025)—push beyond Hughes by redefining the crow as an ontological force rather than a mythic survivor.

HUGHES’S CROW AND THE MYTHOPOETICS OF SURVIVAL

Hughes’s Crow draws on trickster tales, creation myths, Gnostic cosmologies, and the violent energies of the natural world. Crow is a figure who survives creation rather than initiates it. In “Crow’s First Lesson,” for example, God attempts to teach Crow to say “Love,” but Crow can only produce a scream—an utterance that reveals the fundamental incompatibility between divine intention and earthly reality (Hughes 12). As Terry Gifford notes, Hughes’s Crow “exposes the inadequacy of divine language and the brutality of creation” (88). Crow’s role is diagnostic, not generative; he reveals the brokenness of the cosmos but does not repair or reshape it.

Leonard Baskin’s illustrations reinforce this vision. His crows are skeletal, angular, monumental—figures of endurance rather than creation. Baskin’s visual language is one of bone, beak, and shadow, a world in which the crow survives elemental violence rather than shapes cosmic order. The Hughes‑Baskin collaboration thus establishes a crow archetype defined by survival, irony, and mythic endurance.

STRUCTURAL TELEOLOGY IN THOMAS’S A MURDER OF CROWS

Thomas’s A Murder of Crows departs from Hughes’s model in its very architecture. Whereas Hughes begins with Crow as a central mythic figure, Thomas builds toward the crow. The collection is divided into four sections—songbirds, seabirds, raptors, and finally crows. This progression creates a teleological ascent in which the crow becomes the apex of the avian world.

Jeffrey C. Alfier notes that Thomas “constructs an avian hierarchy that culminates in the crow as the book’s interpretive climax,” but Benjamin Myers’s review deepens this insight by revealing the philosophical stakes of this structure. Myers argues that the book’s movement toward the crow parallels its movement toward what he calls the “dark sublime”—a confrontation with the terror inherent in the natural world. Each section intensifies the violence and existential starkness of avian life, preparing the reader for the crow’s arrival as the only creature capable of bearing the full weight of Thomas’s metaphysical vision.

Myers’s reading clarifies that Thomas’s structural crescendo is not merely organizational but ontological. The crow is not simply the final bird; it is the bird that can contain the accumulated terror of the preceding sections and transform it into art. The book’s architecture thus mirrors the crow’s symbolic evolution: from naturalist observation to metaphysical revelation.

VIOLENCE, ART, AND THE DARK SUBLIME

Myers’s review provides a crucial interpretive bridge between Hughes and Thomas. He characterizes A Murder of Crows as “terrible” in the classical sense—evoking terror, awe, and the sublime. This “dark sublime” is precisely what distinguishes Thomas’s crow from Hughes’s. Hughes’s Crow survives a broken cosmos; Thomas’s crow reveals the cosmos as broken and then creates art from that brokenness.

Myers emphasizes Thomas’s ability to present brutality without moral commentary, allowing stark images—such as starlings dropping sparrows “to burst / like ripe figs”—to generate their own emotional and philosophical resonance. This imagistic precision, Myers argues, is what enables Thomas to transform violence into aesthetic experience. The regular stanzaic forms that Myers highlights—“boundaries set by the poet”—become the formal equivalent of the crow’s cosmological power in “Crow‑Speak.”

Thus, Myers helps us see that Thomas’s crow is not merely a creature of violence but a metaphysical artist, a being who shapes terror into form. This is precisely what Hughes’s crow cannot do.

REGIONAL NATURALISM AND THEAMERICANIZATION OF THE CROW

Thomas’s crow is grounded in the landscapes of Texas and the Mississippi Delta. This regional specificity distinguishes him from Hughes, whose crow inhabits a mythic, often European cosmology. Thomas’s crow emerges from mesquite, Delta cotton fields, and Southwestern shadow. Myers observes that Thomas’s crows “extend the American bestiary tradition into metaphysical territory,” merging ecological realism with cosmic ambition.

This grounding allows Thomas to fuse naturalist observation with expressionist intensity. His crows are not abstract mythic figures but creatures embedded in specific ecosystems. Yet these ecosystems become the launching pads for metaphysical speculation. The crow becomes a creature of both region and cosmos, both ecology and ontology.

INTERTEXTUAL LINEAGE: HUGHES, BASKIN, AND THOMAS

Thomas’s dedications—to Hughes in A Murder of Crows and to Baskin in “Sunbird” and The Skin of Light—situate his crow poems within a transatlantic artistic genealogy. Hughes provides the mythic framework; Baskin provides the visual vocabulary. Thomas inherits both but transforms them.

Where Hughes’s crow is a trickster‑survivor and Baskin’s crow is a monumental figure of endurance, Thomas’s crow becomes a cosmic engine, a being whose breath shapes the universe. This transformation is not a rejection of Hughes and Baskin but an extension of their work into new conceptual territory.

“CROW‑SPEAK” AND THE COSMOLOGICAL CROW

“Crow‑Speak,” from Mississippi River Delta: A Bestiary, represents the fullest expression of Thomas’s cosmological ambition. The poem opens with the crow declaring:

“I am sopping with the ink of a cloistered monk.”
(Thomas, “Crow‑Speak”)

Here, the crow becomes a scribe of the universe, soaked in the ink of creation. This fusion of medieval scriptoria and avian blackness establishes the crow as a being of textual and cosmic authority.
The poem then escalates into cosmogenesis:

“When I inhale, a black hole is born.”
(Thomas, “Crow‑Speak”)

and:

“My exhalations split the skin of deep space.”
(Thomas, “Crow‑Speak”)

These lines elevate the crow to a cosmogenic force. Hughes’s crow survives creation; Thomas’s crow creates. Hughes’s crow mocks God; Thomas’s crow sounds like God:

“Each of my caws is the sound a god makes, chain‑sawing iron.”

(Thomas, “Crow‑Speak”)

This is not mythic violence but ontological violence—a force that shapes the universe at the level of physics and metaphysics.

Myers’s insight that Thomas’s poems enact “the struggle of art to master terror” illuminates the cosmological leap in “Crow‑Speak.” The poem’s black holes, ruptured space‑time, and divine metalwork are not arbitrary cosmic metaphors. They are the ultimate extension of the book’s aesthetic project: violence → terror → art → cosmology

Hughes’s crow never completes this trajectory. Thomas’s crow does.

 

THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS: REWRITING THE CROW ARCHETYPE

Thomas’s crow represents a shift from:

• myth → cosmology
• narrative → ontology
• survival → creation
• epic sprawl → lyric singularity

Hughes’s crow is a protagonist. Thomas’s crow is a principle.

Hughes’s crow endures the universe. Thomas’s crow makes the universe—and wounds it with every breath.

This transformation marks one of the most significant expansions of the crow archetype in contemporary poetry.

CONCLUSION

Larry D. Thomas’s crow poems do not merely extend Hughes’s Crow; they redefine the symbolic possibilities of the crow. Through structural crescendo, intertextual homage, regional grounding, and cosmological ambition, Thomas elevates the crow from mythic survivor to cosmic author. In “Crow‑Speak,” the crow becomes a being of ink, gravity, and ruptured space‑time—a creature that precedes myth, precedes creation, and precedes even the universe itself.

Thomas’s crow is not simply darker or more powerful than Hughes’s; it is more fundamental. It is the crow before myth, the crow beneath physics, the crow at the origin of everything.

 

WORKS CITED

Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford UP, 1953.

Alfier, Jeffrey C. “Review of A Murder of Crows by Larry D. Thomas.” Valparaiso Poetry Review, vol. 13, no. 1, 2011, www.valpo.edu/vpr/.

Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Translated by Maria Jolas, Beacon Press, 1994.

Baskin, Leonard. Crows and Other Birds. Grossman Publishers, 1970.

Eliade, Mircea. Myth and Reality. Harper & Row, 1963.

Gifford, Terry. Ted Hughes. Routledge, 2009.

Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. U of Minnesota P, 2008.

Hughes, Ted. Crow: From the Life and Songs of the Crow. Faber and Faber, 1970.

Hughes, Ted, and Leonard Baskin. A Primer of Birds. Faber and Faber, 1981.

Myers, Benjamin. “Terror and Transcendence: A Brief Review of Larry D. Thomas’s A Murder of Crows.” This Is Just to Say, 13 Apr. 2011, [http://myerspoetry.blogspot.com/2011/04/terror-and-transcendence-brief-review.html].

Robinson, Catherine. “Violence, Myth, and the Post‑Human in Ted Hughes’s Crow.” The Ted Hughes Society Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–18.

Sagar, Keith. The Art of Ted Hughes. Cambridge UP, 1975.

Thomas, Larry D. A Murder of Crows. Virtual Artists Collective, 2011.

—. Mississippi River Delta: A Bestiary. Buttonhook Press (Open: Journal of Arts & Letters), 2025.
—. “Crow‑Speak.” Mississippi River Delta: A Bestiary, Buttonhook Press (O:JA&L), 2025.
__.  The Skin of Light.  Dalton Publishing, 2010.

 

ABOUT LARRY D. THOMAS:
LARRY D. THOMAS is an American poet whose work is deeply rooted in the landscapes and histories of the American West and Southwest. Born in Texas, he served for decades in social service and adult criminal justice before devoting himself full‑time to poetry. He is the author of numerous poetry collections, beginning with The Lighthouse Keeper (Timberline Press), a letterpress edition that sold out quickly. Appointed Texas Poet Laureate in 2008 by the Texas Legislature, Thomas is also a member of the Texas Institute of Letters. His poetry has earned multiple major literary awards and appears widely in national journals.

Image: I’m Sorry, Dave #26 (AI-assisted digital image) by O:JA&L staff creative. 2026. Public domain via MidJourney AI.

 

This project was made possible, in part, through support from
Richard Stimac and his new book BLOOD, WATER, AND STONE

available now from Spartan Press.

 

OJAL Art Incorporated, publishing since 2017 as OPEN: Journal of Arts & Letters (O:JA&L) and its imprints Buttonhook Press, HOT BUTTON PRESS Contemporary Issues, and HIGH BUTTON PRESS Contemporary Art, supports writers and artists worldwide.

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series (from OPEN: Journal of Arts & Letters and its Buttonhook Press imprint) gathers acclaimed writers for concise, downloadable chapbooks that pair fresh work with candid reflections on craft. Each installment—often framed by an interview with an associate editor—opens a window onto how masters of poetry, prose poetry, flash fiction, and related hybrid forms build voice, compression, and surprise. Designed as a reader’s invitation and a writer’s toolbox, the series celebrates literary art that moves fast, cuts deep, and lingers long after the last line.

Click on the titles below to explore or download the free PDF chapbooks.

Prose Poetry and Flash Discourse

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Brian Clements on Prose Poetry
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Mark Budman on Flash Discourse
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Ray Gonzalez on Prose Poetry
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Master Series: Michael Martone on Flash Fiction
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Master Series: Roberta Allen on Flash Fiction
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Master Series: Peter Conners on Flash Fiction
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Maxine Chernoff on Prose Poetry
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Pedro Ponce on Flash Fiction
With an Interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Kent Dixon on Flash Fiction & Nonfiction
With an interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

MIixed Forms: Haibun, Haiga, & Tanka Prose

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Roberta Beary on Haibun
With an interview by Associate Editor Pamelyn Casto

Experimental Discourse

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Jim Meirose on Experimental Discourse (XP)
With an interview by Associate Editor Warwick Newnham

Poetry: All forms & styles

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Poetry from Bruce McRae
With an Interview by Associate Editor Jeff Streeby

The Buttonhook Press Masters Series: Poetry from Richard Widerkehr
With an Interview by Associate Editor Jeff Streeby

More titles in press